Power as a Shield: Netanyahu’s Reign, Indictment, and Ultimate Pardon Gambit

For over a generation, the political landscape of Israel has been dominated by one man: Benjamin Netanyahu. His story is not just the story of a prime minister, but a masterclass in political survival, a cautionary tale about the corrosion of power, and a central thread in the fabric of modern Israel’s deepest divisions. To understand Netanyahu is to understand a pivotal, turbulent era in Israeli history.

The Ascent: The Promise of “Bibi”

Netanyahu’s rise was built on a potent, carefully crafted persona. Emerging from the shadow of his celebrated brother Yoni, who died heroically in the 1976 Entebbe raid, Netanyahu positioned himself as “Mr. Security“—a fluent, American-media-savvy defender of Israel in a hostile world. After a stunning electoral upset in 1996, his first term promised a tough stance on terror, economic liberalization, and a deep skepticism of the Oslo Accords.

Even when out of office, he remained a powerful force. His return in 2009 felt, to many, like a return of the seasoned, uncompromising pilot needed to steer the ship through the stormy aftermath of the 2008 Gaza War and growing Iranian nuclear ambitions. The promise was stability, security, and unwavering strength.

The Grip on Power: The Ecosystem of Survival

Netanyahu’s prolonged reign (2009-2021, and again from 2022) was maintained through a combination of genuine political skill and an increasingly divisive playbook. He cultivated a loyal base by portraying himself as the last bastion against a hostile international community, left-wing elites, and Arab political influence. His alliances with nationalist and ultra-Orthodox parties became transactional, often involving promises of funding, legislation, or ministerial posts to secure their support.

Critically, he mastered the art of perpetual campaign mode, framing every political challenge—from elections to policy debates—as an existential struggle for the soul of Israel. This kept his base galvanized and opponents perpetually on the defensive.

The Abuse of Power: The Investigations and the Charges

The gleaming facade began to crack with the emergence of not one, but a series of major corruption investigations. For years, rumors swirled, but by 2016, they had crystallized into formal cases. The most serious, painted a picture of a leader trading regulatory favors for positive media coverage and luxurious gifts.

In November 2019, after a painstaking investigation, the Attorney General indicted Netanyahu for bribery, fraud, and breach of trust. He became the first sitting Israeli prime minister to be charged with a crime.

The Ultimate Use of Power: The Shield of Office

This is where Netanyahu’s story takes its most consequential turn. Rather than stepping down, as previous Israeli leaders had when facing serious legal scrutiny, he chose to fight—not just in court, but from the Prime Minister’s chair. He used the power of his office in a multi-front war to avoid prosecution:

He launched an unprecedented, relentless attack on Israel’s legal institutions. He called the investigations a “witch hunt,” framed prosecutors, police, and judges as part of a deep-state “left-wing coup” orchestrated by the media to overthrow the will of the people. This eroded public trust in foundational pillars of democracy.

 The central goal of his recent governments became passing a judicial overhaul. While supporters argued for rebalancing powers, the undeniable subtext—and often explicit demand from his coalition allies—was to create a legal mechanism to short-circuit his trial. Proposals included laws to allow the Knesset to override Supreme Court decisions and to give the government control over judicial appointments.

He clung to power through fragile, often extreme coalitions, knowing that as Prime Minister he could delay proceedings and maintain a platform to discredit the case. A return to opposition would mean facing his legal battles as a private citizen, stripped of his primary tool of influence.

    The Final Gambit: A Request for Pardon

    In a dramatic and revealing turn, recent reports confirmed that in late 2023, as his trial progressed, Netanyahu’s legal team formally requested a pardon from Israel’s President, Isaac Herzog. This move was striking in its irony and perceived audacity.

    For years, Netanyahu had publicly and vehemently denied all charges, insisting he would clear his name in court. A pardon, however, is not an exoneration; it is an act of clemency that forgives a conviction or preempts a trial altogether. The request seemed to contradict his longstanding claim of a total victory through the legal process. Critics viewed it as the ultimate attempt to leverage political standing for personal legal escape, a final effort to use the mechanisms of the state he once led to wipe the slate clean without a judicial verdict. President Herzog ultimately rejected the request, stating that it was inappropriate and premature while the trial was ongoing.

    The Legacy: A Nation Divided

    Netanyahu’s legacy is now inextricably tied to his battle for personal political survival. His undeniable achievements in economic growth, diplomatic accords like the Abraham Accords, and bolstering Israel’s defense are now viewed by half the country through the prism of a leader they believe sacrificed national unity and institutional integrity to stay out of jail.

    The massive, sustained protests of 2023 were not just about a judicial reform. They were a roar of protest against what millions saw as the ultimate abuse of power: using the highest office in the land as a personal legal defense fund, a battering ram against the justice system, and finally, as a platform to seek a presidential pardon.

    The story is not over. The trial grinds on. The political turmoil continues. But the chapter written by Benjamin Netanyahu stands as a powerful lesson: when a leader’s personal survival becomes entwined with the machinery of the state, democracy itself can be placed on trial.