We often think of political scandals as tales of personal greed, briefcases of cash, luxury villas, private jets. But the most insidious abuses of power aren’t about funding a lavish lifestyle. They are about entrenching power itself, bending the very machinery of the state to ensure your political survival and dominance. The 2011 conviction of former French President Jacques Chirac for “phantom jobs” at Paris City Hall is the textbook case. It wasn’t just embezzlement; it was a systemic attack on the fundamental democratic principle of the rotation of power.
The Scheme: Public Money for Party Power
For nearly two decades as Mayor of Paris (1977-1995), Chirac presided over a simple, brazen scheme. The city payroll included individuals who, on paper, were gardeners, secretaries, or project managers. In reality, they reported to work at the headquarters of Chirac’s political party, the Rally for the Republic (RPR), or on his 1995 presidential campaign. Their salaries, funded entirely by Parisian taxpayers, were a direct, illegal subsidy to Chirac’s political machine.
This was no small operation. The conviction centered on 21 such “phantom jobs,” a mere slice of a practice believed to have been widespread. The crime was embezzlement and abuse of public trust. The goal was political invincibility, while the total cost to Paris taxpayers was estimated at approximately €1.4 million ($1.8 million).
Corrupting the Cycle of Power
Why does this matter so much for democracy? The rotation of power depends on a level playing field. Competing parties need to fund their operations, organize, and campaign based on their ideas, their membership, and legal, transparent funding. What Chirac’s system did was profoundly corrupt:
Weaponizing Public Resources: It turned the Parisian administration—a neutral entity meant to serve all citizens—into a cog in the RPR’s campaign machine. Every phantom salary was a resource denied to public services and granted to a private political entity.
Creating an Unfair Advantage distorting the rotation of power: While opposition parties struggled with legitimate fundraising, Chirac’s party had a secret, steady, and illicit cash flow from the public treasury. This allowed for more staff, more organizing, more campaign materials, and a stronger ground game—advantages bought not with popular support, but with stolen funds.
Blurring the Line Between State and Party: The scheme created a class of people whose loyalty was to the party, paid for by the state. It entrenched a culture where the party was the state, and the state’s resources were the party’s birthright. This erodes public trust and makes the idea of a neutral administration a fiction.
The Shield of Immunity: Deferred Justice, Distorted History
The most audacious twist was the timing. The crimes occurred in the early 1990s, but Chirac wasn’t tried until 2011. Why? Because in 1995, he ascended to the French Presidency, which granted him immunity from prosecution.
For 12 years, while he shaped national and global policy, the judicial process was frozen.
The Symbolic Conviction and Its Bitter Legacy
When the conviction finally came, a two-year suspended sentence, it was historic: the first post-war French head of state found guilty of a crime. Yet, it felt paradoxically empty. Chirac, by then an ailing elder statesman, never saw a cell.
The impact on the rotation of power is therefore twofold and contradictory:
A Landmark for Accountability: It established that no one, not even a revered president, is above the law forever. It strengthened the judiciary’s role in policing the political class after they leave office, making the post-presidency a potential moment of reckoning.
A Lesson in Institutional Corruption: The case stands as a permanent warning. The greatest threat to fair competition isn’t always a rigged ballot on election day. It can be the slow, systemic hijacking of public institutions years before, turning them into engines for perpetual incumbency.
In the end, the “phantom jobs” scandal was never just about money. It was about using the city’s treasury as a slush fund to monopolize political space. It delayed justice with the shield of high office and demonstrated how the abuse of public resources doesn’t just fill pockets, it can, for a time, freeze the very wheels of democratic change. The true cost was paid by the citizens of Paris and the health of French democracy, which took a silent, expensive hit for years before the ledger was finally, partially, settled.
Home 
Leave a comment